This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Comments on the suggestion to use infinite precision math for wide int.
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:02:41 -0700
- Subject: Re: Comments on the suggestion to use infinite precision math for wide int.
- References: <506C72C7 dot 7090207 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc2buJtu8RMKnLnvvb-A2=aYwopO+RBLPO6iJ3gKnq-hvg at mail dot gmail dot com> <87pq3y3kyk dot fsf at sandifor-thinkpad dot stglab dot manchester dot uk dot ibm dot com> <CAFiYyc3NjOxpQ-Y9GDrQOET+dc3LXWuiuM=DxqmyASE8urRoWw at mail dot gmail dot com> <50912D85 dot 1070002 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc2Q2UQPmkhExi2c8f-BSGLv+Rq1rOy4NdPQmTqSRE1A0A at mail dot gmail dot com> <5091331C dot 3030504 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc1L6zuehE75dEfd_fB1-81F1fDHpL3kS=tbk6qAK3Texg at mail dot gmail dot com> <512D686B dot 90000 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc3fXewAW2dU6-RHLiTQ-ZiLgdWmfwdFF6k1VqxPsrvZbQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <515B16EB dot 5020303 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc2qWwDcqzCMpMSiQ72w5ry=a3ZpxkFkiK7OvvBA0h4eGw at mail dot gmail dot com> <515C1AFB dot 3080105 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc12qGj92j+5yCUEpghOZXqjjAgOzS_H6QJpKvd-dyfU0A at mail dot gmail dot com> <515C55D7 dot 7020003 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc0sp1wbq1J+FXoJWcb9UcsOWiwjJ_KaQkbbgCnddxhVzA at mail dot gmail dot com> <5161AA07 dot 7090706 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc1QArda2jm56=eT_ugqX39m4tW=gf7FCowuruq-xOdQGg at mail dot gmail dot com> <5162BB64 dot 3070007 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAGqM8fYKvS6uNW3smZBUQcWZHtqUzR5yD-dkh3Zvkn7mALKVbQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc0Cj6=M1__GWs9KsFcTfMJGDV9E74gdrzZsus6N0nbX7g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAGqM8fZ7NxiMnC6PTA8v6w_E6ZJ5HbjhJXzh-HAOJqaSx+7rnw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc2AqFNmWLu7bOS5_6j56bbMd9pXTY4eAAK=bc-0B-O2-w at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Apr 10, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I think we want to test ~(T)0<(T)0 here.
Thanks Lawrence, in the next version of the patch, you will discover this at the bottom if you look hard. :-)