This is the mail archive of the
`gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org`
mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|

Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |

Other format: | [Raw text] |

*From*: Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>*To*: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>*Cc*: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>*Date*: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:39:46 -0700*Subject*: Re: Comments on the suggestion to use infinite precision math for wide int.*References*: <506C72C7 dot 7090207 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc2buJtu8RMKnLnvvb-A2=aYwopO+RBLPO6iJ3gKnq-hvg at mail dot gmail dot com> <87pq3y3kyk dot fsf at sandifor-thinkpad dot stglab dot manchester dot uk dot ibm dot com> <CAFiYyc3NjOxpQ-Y9GDrQOET+dc3LXWuiuM=DxqmyASE8urRoWw at mail dot gmail dot com> <50912D85 dot 1070002 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc2Q2UQPmkhExi2c8f-BSGLv+Rq1rOy4NdPQmTqSRE1A0A at mail dot gmail dot com> <5091331C dot 3030504 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc1L6zuehE75dEfd_fB1-81F1fDHpL3kS=tbk6qAK3Texg at mail dot gmail dot com> <512D686B dot 90000 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc3fXewAW2dU6-RHLiTQ-ZiLgdWmfwdFF6k1VqxPsrvZbQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <515B16EB dot 5020303 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc2qWwDcqzCMpMSiQ72w5ry=a3ZpxkFkiK7OvvBA0h4eGw at mail dot gmail dot com> <515C1AFB dot 3080105 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc12qGj92j+5yCUEpghOZXqjjAgOzS_H6QJpKvd-dyfU0A at mail dot gmail dot com> <515C55D7 dot 7020003 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc0sp1wbq1J+FXoJWcb9UcsOWiwjJ_KaQkbbgCnddxhVzA at mail dot gmail dot com> <5161AA07 dot 7090706 at naturalbridge dot com> <CAFiYyc1QArda2jm56=eT_ugqX39m4tW=gf7FCowuruq-xOdQGg at mail dot gmail dot com> <5162BB64 dot 3070007 at naturalbridge dot com>

On 4/8/13, Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com> wrote: > The other problem, which i invite you to use the full power of > your c++ sorcery on, is the one where defining an operator so > that wide-int + unsigned hwi is either rejected or properly > zero extended. If you can do this, I will go along with > your suggestion that the internal rep should be sign extended. > Saying that constants are always sign extended seems ok, but there > are a huge number of places where we convert unsigned hwis as > the second operand and i do not want that to be a trap. I went > thru a round of this, where i did not post the patch because i > could not make this work. And the number of places where you > want to use an hwi as the second operand dwarfs the number of > places where you want to use a small integer constant. You can use overloading, as in the following, which actually ignores handling the sign in the representation. class number { unsigned int rep1; int representation; public: number(int arg) : representation(arg) {} number(unsigned int arg) : representation(arg) {} friend number operator+(number, int); friend number operator+(number, unsigned int); friend number operator+(int, number); friend number operator+(unsigned int, number); }; number operator+(number n, int si) { return n.representation + si; } number operator+(number n, unsigned int ui) { return n.representation + ui; } number operator+(int si, number n) { return n.representation + si; } number operator+(unsigned int ui, number n) { return n.representation + ui; } If the argument type is of a template type parameter, then you can test the template type via if (std::is_signed<T>::value) .... // sign extend else .... // zero extend See http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/type_traits/is_signed/. If you want to handle non-builtin types that are asigne dor unsigned, then you need to add a specialization for is_signed. -- Lawrence Crowl

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Comments on the suggestion to use infinite precision math for wide int.***From:*Richard Biener

**References**:**Re: patch to fix constant math - 4th patch - the wide-int class - patch ping for the next stage 1***From:*Richard Biener

**Re: patch to fix constant math - 4th patch - the wide-int class - patch ping for the next stage 1***From:*Kenneth Zadeck

**Re: patch to fix constant math - 4th patch - the wide-int class - patch ping for the next stage 1***From:*Richard Biener

**Re: patch to fix constant math - 4th patch - the wide-int class - patch ping for the next stage 1***From:*Kenneth Zadeck

**Re: patch to fix constant math - 4th patch - the wide-int class - patch ping for the next stage 1***From:*Richard Biener

**Re: patch to fix constant math - 4th patch - the wide-int class - patch ping for the next stage 1***From:*Kenneth Zadeck

**Re: patch to fix constant math - 4th patch - the wide-int class - patch ping for the next stage 1***From:*Richard Biener

**Comments on the suggestion to use infinite precision math for wide int.***From:*Kenneth Zadeck

**Re: Comments on the suggestion to use infinite precision math for wide int.***From:*Richard Biener

**Re: Comments on the suggestion to use infinite precision math for wide int.***From:*Kenneth Zadeck

Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|

Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |