This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR48182

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:00:43PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/05/2013 02:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:42:19PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>?  I must be missing something, the change causes an early bail out
> >>from try_crossjump_to_edge.
> >>
> >>We don't want to raise the min to > 0 as that doesn't allow the user
> >>to turn on this specific transformation.
> >
> >The condition is
> >     return false; // aka "don't crossjump"
> >So, the smaller the N in --param min-crossjump-insns=N is, the more likely
> >we crossjump.  Thus N=0 should mean that it is most likely we crossjump,
> >and as N=1 requires that at least one insn matches, N=0 would mean that
> >even zero insns can match.  If we for --param min-crossjump-insns=0
> >always return false, it means we never crossjump, so it is least likely
> >that we crossjump, which corresponds to largest possible N, not smallest
> >one.
> Yes the smaller the N, the more likely we are to crossjump, of
> course the value 0 would make no sense (I'm clearly out of practice
> on reviews :-).
> Yea, changing the min value in params.def to 1 would be a better way
> to fix.  Consider that patch pre-approved.

Ok, thanks.  I'll apply this one.  Regtest/bootstrap pending.

2013-04-08  Marek Polacek  <>

	PR rtl-optimization/48182
	* params.def (PARAM_MIN_CROSSJUMP_INSNS): Increase the minimum
	value to 1.

--- gcc/	2013-04-08 08:38:48.515263034 +0200
+++ gcc/params.def	2013-04-08 08:39:10.444340238 +0200
      "The minimum number of matching instructions to consider for crossjumping",
-     5, 0, 0)
+     5, 1, 0)
 /* The maximum number expansion factor when copying basic blocks.  */


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]