This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 03/26/2013 11:00 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ tree ce_index = cxx_constant_value (ce->index);
+
+ if (TREE_CODE (ce_index) == INTEGER_CST)
+ {
/* A C99 designator is OK if it matches the current index. */
- if (TREE_INT_CST_LOW (ce->index) == index)
+ if (TREE_INT_CST_LOW (ce_index) == index)
return true;
Hmm, it occurs to me that we probably want to replace ce->index with the constant value for the benefit of varasm. I'm surprised that the testcase passes without doing that.
Jason
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |