Re: [patch] cilkplus array notation for C (clean, independent patchset, take 1)

[Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>]

On 03/20/2013 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:

> As I'd mentioned, you have .exp files named compile.exp and execute.exp
> which seem to be causing ambiguity problems in parallel checks (make
> check -jN).  For some reason, with this patch, the rest of dg.exp fails
> to run after Cilkplus' compile/execute.exp runs.  Renaming these to
> something less generic does the trick.  Do you mind prefixing all the
> .exp's with "cilkplus_" or something similar?
>
> [Perhaps someone can pontificate as to what the actual problem is here
> and describe it.  Dejagnu is a mystery to me.]
I doubt it's anything really related to dejagnu and is more related to 
how the "make check" target is constructed in gcc/Makefile.in.  It's 
brutally ugly.

I recently had to swap in some dejagnu/tcl basics; and I did everything 
possible to forget it as soon as possible.  I'd really forgotten how 
much I hated writing tcl code.

Jeff