This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] Fix c++/56243

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Fabien Chêne <fabien dot chene at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:20:58 -0500
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] Fix c++/56243
References: <CAFH4-dibDMbjXAX2APBBD-9mBfweXKfhiC_insdNV63hOA8Wuw@mail.gmail.com> <512BF2B3.1070106@redhat.com> <512BF2F9.6060901@redhat.com>

On 02/25/2013 06:25 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:

On 02/25/2013 06:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think my preference would be to avoid calling fixed_type_or_null at
all when we're in a template.  I already changed
resolves_to_fixed_type_p that way, now we need to fix build_vtbl_ref_1.
Oops, now I see the discussion on the PR. I'll take a look.

I can't reproduce the regression on constexpr-static10.C. What was the earlier patch that was having trouble?

Jason

References:
- [C++ Patch] Fix c++/56243
  - From: Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ Patch] Fix c++/56243
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] Fix c++/56243
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]