This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: [PATCH,ARM] Fix 56110
Tilman Sauerbeck [2013-02-19 23:26]:
> However it breaks the case where the 2nd operand is a const_int that
> *can* be used as an immediate (eg 0x80), and ends up generating the
> AND/CMP combination.
... and that would be because I changed the operand patterns in
zeroextractsi_compare0_scratch and didn't restore the originals when
trying the new diff :/
So the diff I posted last night might do the trick.
If there's no obvious reason why it would be wrong, I'll start a
bootstrap and regression test tonight.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?