This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [wwwdocs] document -Wshadow change in 4.8

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:13:03 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] document -Wshadow change in 4.8
References: <CAESRpQD-6S6KquHnH6cUu7r2gSh06Kyn3g43rvo0sYTY7xfFiQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1302100044270.5073@tuna.site> <CAESRpQC_igqVCLRg=xGHN8_kDOqZA3KJSKRh4=puzMmSbYGSqQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> The only question I have is about "unless the variable is a function".
>> How can a variable be a function?
> True. What about: "if a declaration shadows a function decqlaration,
> unless the former declares a function or a pointer to function."

Yes, that'll work I think.

> I also realized that Wshadow is not C-only, so I will move the item
> to C family.

Thanks!

Gerald

References:
- [wwwdocs] document -Wshadow change in 4.8
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: [wwwdocs] document -Wshadow change in 4.8
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [wwwdocs] document -Wshadow change in 4.8
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]