This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, PR56193] - Wrong test operator for basic_ios in C++11

From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:34:13 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR56193] - Wrong test operator for basic_ios in C++11
References: <51131A02.7020104@verizon.net> <CAH6eHdQXdpYBQkVrmyHy1H5R3zNo43UNff8FjbR6vvj4dPOw-A@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/07/2013 04:18 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

On 7 February 2013 03:05, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
greetings,
On SO someone noticed that g++ still has in the basic_ios class
   operator void*();
instead of
   explicit operator bool() const;
The old C++98 operator allows things like
   std::cout << std::cout;
This patch changes the stream test operator for C++11 and onwards.

This patch builds and tests clean on x86_64-unknown-linux.
Please use -std=gnu++11 in the test's dg-options and CC the
gcc-patches list too.
OK for trunk with that change, thanks.

Attached patch applied.

Attachment: CL_basic_ios_bool
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_basic_ios_bool_2
Description: Text document

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]