This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
PING: [PATCH, ARM] New CPU support for Marvell PJ4 cores
- From: Yi-Hsiu Hsu <ahsu at marvell dot com>
- To: Chung-Lin Tang <cltang at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at linaro dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:52:37 -0800
- Subject: PING: [PATCH, ARM] New CPU support for Marvell PJ4 cores
- References: <689C75E0D210324F8BE88961219F681624B5949520@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> <CACUk7=WiZr-GEbHPjBOZ8=OP9jr2XqMnOWfrPSOANDkqs771ZA@mail.gmail.com> <689C75E0D210324F8BE88961219F681624B5BCD276@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> <CACUk7=VX0cmx2x+z9WYsnkPLKiDK7Db9S-kqQg0w3zbZayAOEQ@mail.gmail.com> <689C75E0D210324F8BE88961219F681624B5C54D1C@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> <4FE93674.5070409@codesourcery.com>
This patch is pending for a long time.
Any progress?
Cheers,
Yi-Hsiu, Hsu
-----Original Message-----
From: Yi-Hsiu Hsu
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:51 PM
To: 'Chung-Lin Tang'
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH, ARM] New CPU support for Marvell PJ4 cores
Hi Chung-Lin,
I think tune_marvell attribute better be kept for future Marvell cores extension.
Thanks!
B.R.
Yi-Hsiu, Hsu
-----Original Message-----
From: Chung-Lin Tang [mailto:cltang@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 12:12 PM
To: Yi-Hsiu Hsu
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, ARM] New CPU support for Marvell PJ4 cores
On 2012/6/26 09:37 AM, Yi-Hsiu Hsu wrote:
> Updated changelog.
>
> * config/arm/marvell-pj4.md: New marvell-pj4 pipeline description.
> * config/arm/arm.c (arm_issue_rate): Add marvell_pj4.
> * config/arm/arm.md (tune_marvell): Add marvell_pj4.
> * config/arm/arm-cores.def: Add core marvell-pj4.
> * config/arm/arm-tune.md: Regenerated.
> * config/arm/arm-tables.opt: Regenerated.
> * config/arm/bpabi.h (BE8_LINK_SPEC): Add marvell_pj4.
> * doc/invoke.texi: Added entry for marvell-pj4.
Another nit, I think the tune_marvell attribute now looks a bit unneeded. You can just fold it into the "tune" clause of "generic_sched".
Thanks,
Chung-Lin