This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Sparc ASAN
From: Peter Bergner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:28:51 -0600
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 23:19 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> The address violation detection seems to work properly and the only
>> thing that seems to be left are some backtrace/unwind issues. These
>> are perhaps similar to the unwind bits that the powerpc folks ran
> David, does the following patch (will have some fuzz since I removed
> one ppc only hunk from the patch) fix your backtrace issue? I'll note
> you'll have to add "|| defined(__sparc__)" to the #if ... or as
> it's probably going to turn out, just replace the whole thing
> with a "#if !defined(__i386__) && !defined(__x86_64__)".
This patch works well but I have some unrelated sanitizer sparc
issues to resolve before the testcase will pass properly.
Feel free to submit this with the __sparc__ cpp test added, or
the !x86 variant, at your discretion.