This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Enable libsanitizer on powerpc{,64}


Evgeniy, my change broke the ARM Android runs:
sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace.cc:147 "((size > count)) != (0)"
(0x0, 0x0)

Could you please take a look?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 17:52 +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > Doing a quick peruse through your LLVM commit, I see you grabbed the
>> > PopStackFrames() addition, but the asan_linux.cc changes do not include
>> > the call to PopStackFrames() after the _Unwind_Backtrace() call.
>> > Specifically, the following patch hunk:
>> >
>> >>      _Unwind_Backtrace(Unwind_Trace, stack);
>> >> > +    // Pop off the two ASAN functions from the backtrace.
>> >> > +    stack->PopStackFrames(2);
>>
>> Ah, indeed, I missed that.
>> Since the patch also affects ARM, I'd like to hear from Evgeniy Stepanov
>> (or we may decouple powerpc from arm)
>
> I specifically added that call for all architectures that use
> _Unwind_Backtrace, since I believe they will all see the two
> extra ASAN functions on the call stack since that is an artifact
> of how _Unwind_Backtrace works.  That being said, it would be good
> for someone to confirm that change works for ARM...or SPARC
> once David gets the SPARC changes ready since he seems to me
> not far behind us (ie, POWER).
>
> Peter
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]