This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PR 55238] More careful pass-through handling in find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset


Hi,

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:42:46AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> 	* testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr55238.c: New test.
> 
> Does this PR rely on hidden visibility?  The new testcase uses
> attribute visibility hidden, but does not check DejaGNU
> dg-require-visibility and fails on AIX.

No, at least on my i686 desktop it does not rely on it.  I will apply
the following patch in a few hours (after I add it to some testing run
on x86_64), unless someone objects.

Thanks,

Martin


2012-11-20  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>

	* gcc.dg/torture/pr55238.c: Remove hidden attribute.

Index: src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr55238.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr55238.c
+++ src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr55238.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ gzbuffer (void *file, int size)
   gz_reset (state);
 }
 
-void __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) gz_error (gz_state *state, int err, char *msg)
+void gz_error (gz_state *state, int err, char *msg)
 {
   if (state->msg != 0)
     {


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]