This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Reduce complette unrolling & peeling limits


> Did you notice that gcc.c-torture/compile/pr43186.c regressed?  It now again
> takes a while to compile, so times out on slow machines:
> ...

On a 2.5Ghz Core2Duo, compiling the test with revision 192891 (2012-10-28)
takes a small fraction of a second, while with revision 193270 (2012-11-06)
it takes ~25s.

However this patch makes gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f to fail

FAIL: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f  -O   scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "[0-9] \\\\* " 22

After it 22 should be replaced with 16 (thresshold max-completely-peeled-insns=138
gives 16, =139 gives 22).

Dominique


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]