This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch RFA middle-end] Fix PR target/41993

From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
To: ebotcazou at adacore dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ubizjak at gmail dot com
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:33:00 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: [patch RFA middle-end] Fix PR target/41993
References: <5638451.sS5NhrCmua@polaris> <20121106.181149.329181824.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> <3077494.2GIbD6pb8v@polaris>

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
> I was referring to the ret_start/reg_end/nregs business: why is it necessary?

I thought that they are for the return value which requires
multiple hard registers.

Regards,
	kaz

References:
- Re: [patch RFA middle-end] Fix PR target/41993
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [patch RFA middle-end] Fix PR target/41993
  - From: Kaz Kojima
- Re: [patch RFA middle-end] Fix PR target/41993
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]