This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: exception safety validation
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 14:12:21 +0000
- Subject: Re: exception safety validation
- References: <50660529.8020306@gmail.com> <506DE590.7090706@gmail.com> <509521C5.1030809@gmail.com> <CAH6eHdRs8xMVzZ=fPXeZhrOx3Bbv1iJ-ZshZ_o7OTR2CkzT41g@mail.gmail.com>
On 3 November 2012 14:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 November 2012 13:53, François Dumont wrote:
>> Here is an updated proposal using default implementations as much as
>> possible.
>
> Please check the indentation of the "struct emplace_point" specializations.
>
> In testsuite/util/testsuite_container_traits.h
>
> +#ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
> + typedef std::true_type has_emplace;
> +#endif
>
> true_type isn't even defined unless it's C++11
My point being that the rest of the file already uses C++11-only features