This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 06/13] Implement protection of stack variables

From: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
Cc: Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin dot s dot serebryany at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Wei Mi <wmi at google dot com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:40:09 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] Implement protection of stack variables
References: <1351799566-31447-1-git-send-email-dodji@redhat.com> <1351799566-31447-7-git-send-email-dodji@redhat.com> <CAGQ9bdweH8Pn=8vLTNa8FSzAh92OYrWScxK78n9znCodADJUvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZ+mTWa3MF5D3kU9u2Xwe5zBz-k7yHUN+nj2+kDfwjCp1Q@mail.gmail.com>

Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> writes:

> Changing the option is part of the plan.

Indeed.

> Dodji, can you make the option change part of one the patches (e.g,
> the first one that introduces it) -- there seems no need for a
> separate patch for it.

Sure thing.  I have done the change on my local tree.  I'll re-submit
the patch a bit later.  I am doing a bit of patch merging along with
that one, in reply to the comments made by Joseph in another subtread.

Cheers.

-- 
		Dodji

References:
- [PATCH 00/13] Request to merge Address Sanitizer in
  - From: dodji
- [PATCH 06/13] Implement protection of stack variables
  - From: dodji
- Re: [PATCH 06/13] Implement protection of stack variables
  - From: Xinliang David Li

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]