Remove duplicated block of code

[Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>]

Hello,

this patch removes one copy of a block of code that somehow ended up 
duplicated. Richard Henderson apparently already fixed part of the problem 
here:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00120.html

but missed this bit (or was it a different patch?).

Not yet tested (seems obvious enough), but I'll still do it after I get an 
ok.

2012-09-24  Marc Glisse  <marc.glisse@inria.fr>

	* expr.c (do_store_flag): Remove duplicated code.

--
Marc Glisse

Index: expr.c
===================================================================
--- expr.c	(revision 191640)
+++ expr.c	(working copy)
@@ -10679,33 +10679,22 @@ do_store_flag (sepops ops, rtx target, e
   /* For vector typed comparisons emit code to generate the desired
      all-ones or all-zeros mask.  Conveniently use the VEC_COND_EXPR
      expander for this.  */
   if (TREE_CODE (ops->type) == VECTOR_TYPE)
     {
       tree ifexp = build2 (ops->code, ops->type, arg0, arg1);
       tree if_true = constant_boolean_node (true, ops->type);
       tree if_false = constant_boolean_node (false, ops->type);
       return expand_vec_cond_expr (ops->type, ifexp, if_true, if_false, target);
     }
 
-  /* For vector typed comparisons emit code to generate the desired
-     all-ones or all-zeros mask.  Conveniently use the VEC_COND_EXPR
-     expander for this.  */
-  if (TREE_CODE (ops->type) == VECTOR_TYPE)
-    {
-      tree ifexp = build2 (ops->code, ops->type, arg0, arg1);
-      tree if_true = constant_boolean_node (true, ops->type);
-      tree if_false = constant_boolean_node (false, ops->type);
-      return expand_vec_cond_expr (ops->type, ifexp, if_true, if_false, target);
-    }
-
   /* Get the rtx comparison code to use.  We know that EXP is a comparison
      operation of some type.  Some comparisons against 1 and -1 can be
      converted to comparisons with zero.  Do so here so that the tests
      below will be aware that we have a comparison with zero.   These
      tests will not catch constants in the first operand, but constants
      are rarely passed as the first operand.  */
 
   switch (ops->code)
     {
     case EQ_EXPR:
       code = EQ;