This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add -Og optimization level - optimize for compile-time/debugging experience


On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > This adds -Og as optimization level targeted at the devel-compile-debug
> > cycle (formerly mostly tied to -O0 due to debug issues with even -O1).
> >
> > Discussion on gcc@gcc.gnu.org at least shows interest in this, so this
> > is a formal patch submission with a request for comments on the
> > implementation (not necessarily on what passes are enabled and why).
> >
> > I have bootstrapped and tested this patch with BOOT_C/CXX_FLAGS="-Og -g"
> > TARGET_CFLAGS="-Og -g" with all languages included (but -Werror disabled,
> > as expected some new maybe-uninit uses pop up).
> >
> > Ok for trunk?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
> >
> > 2012-09-18  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
> >
> >         PR other/53316
> >         * common.opt (optimize_debug): New variable.
> >         (Og): New optimization level.
> >         * doc/invoke.texi (Og): Document.
> >         * opts.c (maybe_default_option): Add debug parameter.
> >         (maybe_default_options): Likewise.
> >         (default_options_optimization): Handle -Og.
> >         (common_handle_option): Likewise.
> >         * passes.c (gate_all_optimizations): Do not run with -Og.
> >         (gate_all_optimizations_g): New gate, run with -Og.
> >         (pass_all_optimizations_g): New container pass, run with -Og.
> >         (init_optimization_passes): Schedule pass_all_optimizations_g
> >         alongside pass_all_optimizations.
> >
> >         * gcc/testsuite/lib/c-torture.exp: Add -Og -g to default
> >         TORTURE_OPTIONS.
> >
> 
> Glibc must be compiled with optimization.  Will -Og build glibc?

Apply the patch and check for yourself.  I suppose the answer will
be yes (whatever "optimization" requirements glibc has).

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]