This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 54594: Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous

From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:51:24 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 54594: Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous
References: <CAKwh3qjnJ2kGvqt96GwY7_DB5iE5uvfxk-jX0KP_f3HXDnVPwg@mail.gmail.com> <505607A8.8030502@net-b.de>

>> here is an OOP patch for type-bound generics. The problem was that
>> specifics with polymorphic arguments of different ranks were wrongly
>> rejected as ambiguous, because 'gfc_compare_types' did not properly
>> handle CLASS arrays. The patch fixes this is regtests cleanly on
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>
>
> OK. Looks rather obvious to me. Thanks for fixing it quickly.

Thanks. Committed as r191365.

Cheers,
Janus

References:
- [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 54594: Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 54594: Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]