This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] [0/5] PR 45586: restrict vs. non-restrict type compatibility hell

From: Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>
To: Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:15:03 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] [0/5] PR 45586: restrict vs. non-restrict type compatibility hell
References: <20120825180043.C73E73BE1A@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <50392F32.3080907@sfr.fr> <20120826112328.0AB1C3BE1A@mailhost.lps.ens.fr>

On 26/08/2012 13:23, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> With the modified patch, gfortran.dg/restrict_type_compat_1.f90 fails
> for a regular test:
> 
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/restrict_type_compat_1.f90  -O   scan-tree-dump-times original "VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR" 13
> 
> A manual check shows only 6 instances of VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR.
> 
Yes, this is expected.
It doesn't fix all the failures anyway, so something else is needed.

Mikael

References:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] [0/5] PR 45586: restrict vs. non-restrict type compatibility hell
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: [Patch, fortran] [0/5] PR 45586: restrict vs. non-restrict type compatibility hell
  - From: Mikael Morin
- Re: [Patch, fortran] [0/5] PR 45586: restrict vs. non-restrict type compatibility hell
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]