This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (5/6 - double_int rewrite)

From: Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:33:42 -0700
Subject: Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (5/6 - double_int rewrite)
References: <20120812201515.GA14973@google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208122330461.3253@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr> <CAFiYyc2W+9ukNnBT_dtszUahxj1mWmLDc7_daDoT2a0xVkL0WA@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/13/12, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> Increment/decrement operations did not exist, please do not add
> them at this point.

Note that I have also added +=, -= and *= operations.  Having them
has three advantages.  First, it matches expectations on what
numeric types allow.  Second, it results in more concise code.
Third, it results in potentially faster code.  I think we should
be able to use those operators.

When I run through changing call sites, I really want to change
the sites to the final form, not do two passes.

-- 
Lawrence Crowl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (5/6 - double_int rewrite)
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Merge C++ conversion into trunk (5/6 - double_int rewrite)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (5/6 - double_int rewrite)
  - From: Marc Glisse
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (5/6 - double_int rewrite)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]