This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ARM Patch 1/3]PR53189: optimizations of 64bit logic operation with constant
On 18 July 2012 09:20, Carrot Wei <carrot@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> <ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Carrot,
>>
>> Sorry about the delayed response.
>>
>> On 3 July 2012 12:28, Carrot Wei <carrot@google.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
>>> <ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On 28 May 2012 11:08, Carrot Wei <carrot@google.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the second part of the patches that deals with 64bit and. It directly
>>>>> extends the patterns anddi3, anddi3_insn and anddi3_neon to handle 64bit
>>>>> constant operands.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Comments about const_di_ok_for_op still apply from my review of your add patch.
>>>>
>>>> However I don't see why and /ior / xor with constants that have either
>>>> the low or high parts set can't be expanded directly into ands of
>>>> subregs with moves of zero's or the original value especially if you
>>>> aren't looking at doing 64 bit operations in neon .With Neon being
>>>> used for 64 bit arithmetic it gets more interesting.
>>>>
>>>> Finally this should target PR target/53189.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ramana
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review. Following is the updated patch according to
>>> your comments.
>>
>> You've missed answering this part of my review :)
>>
>>>> However I don't see why and /ior / xor with constants that have either
>>>> the low or high parts set can't be expanded directly into ands of
>>>> subregs with moves of zero's or the original value especially if you
>>>> aren't looking at doing 64 bit operations in neon .With Neon being
>>>> used for 64 bit arithmetic it gets more interesting.
>>
> It has been handled by the const_ok_for_dimode_op and the output part
> of corresponding SI mode insn. Let's take the IOR case as an example.
>
I noticed that - If I wasn't clear enough, the question was more
towards generating a subreg move at expand time rather than a split
and handling while outputting asm if you see what I mean.
regards,
Ramana