This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Updated to respond to various email comments from Jason, Diego and Cary (issue6197069)

On 06/22/2012 02:15 PM, Cary Coutant wrote: 
But if the consensus turns out to be that enumerators should be in
pubnames, wouldn't it also be fairly easy to change prune_unused_types
so that it doesn't mark enumerators, and change output_pubnames to
skip enumerators that have been pruned?

This makes sense to me.

Jason

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]