This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add vector cost model density heuristic


On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 13:49 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> > > 
> > <snip>
> > > 
> > > Hmm.  I don't like this patch or its general idea too much.  Instead
> > > I'd like us to move more of the cost model detail to the target, giving
> > > it a chance to look at the whole loop before deciding on a cost.  ISTR
> > > posting the overall idea at some point, but let me repeat it here instead
> > > of trying to find that e-mail.
> > > 
> > > The basic interface of the cost model should be, in targetm.vectorize
> > > 
> > >   /* Tell the target to start cost analysis of a loop or a basic-block
> > >      (if the loop argument is NULL).  Returns an opaque pointer to
> > >      target-private data.  */
> > >   void *init_cost (struct loop *loop);
> > > 
> > >   /* Add cost for N vectorized-stmt-kind statements in vector_mode.  */
> > >   void add_stmt_cost (void *data, unsigned n,
> > > 		      vectorized-stmt-kind,
> > >                       enum machine_mode vector_mode);
> > > 
> > >   /* Tell the target to compute and return the cost of the accumulated
> > >      statements and free any target-private data.  */
> > >   unsigned finish_cost (void *data);
> 
> By the way, I don't see much point in passing the void *data around
> here.  Too many levels of interfaces that we'd have to pass it around in
> the vectorizer, so it would just sit in a static variable.  Might as
> well let the data be wholly private to the target.

Ok, so you'd have void init_cost (struct loop *) and
unsigned finish_cost (void); then?  Static variables are of couse
not properly "abstracted" so we can't ever compute two set of costs
at the same time ... but that's true all-over-the-place in GCC ...

With previous discussion the add_stmt_cost hook would be split up
to also allow passing the operation code for example.

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]