This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add XLP-specific atomic instructions and tweaks.
On 2012-06-17 13:01, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> > Not required if you use the proper predicate in the expander.
>> > The middle-end will take care of this for you.
> I might be misunderstanding, sorry, but this expander is shared with
> the normal LL/SC path, which can accept plain memory_operands.
> I was thinking we'd want to keep the expander predicates the same
> and apply these SWAP-style restrictions only when needed.
Ah right. That's a different question then.
r~