This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rs6000: Rewrite sync patterns for atomic; expand early.


On 2012-06-11 18:40, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:
> 
>> Nope.  I do see the obvious mistake in the atomic_load pattern though:
>> The mode iterator should have been INT1 not INT.
> 
> Did you want to commit the fix for the iterator?

Yes.  I'm just finishing testing that patch in fact.

> I like your suggestion, but the PowerPC developer community does not
> uniformly appreciate that behavior.

Surely there's a difference between gratuitously using fp registers
and that being the *only* way to implement a particular operation...


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]