This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: fix install-no-fixedincludes mishaps


Il 24/05/2012 15:32, Olivier Hainque ha scritto:
> Hello Ian,
> 
> On May 24, 2012, at 14:22 , Olivier Hainque wrote:
>> 	libgcc/
>> 	* Makefile.in: move dependency on install-unwind_h from
>> 	"install-leaf" to "install".
> 
>  Testing went fine for me. Here is what I checked:
> 
>  For a pristine tree:
> 
>    configure --enable-languages=c --disable-libada --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap 
>    make
>    find . -name unwind.h -ls > ls0
>    make maintainer-clean-target-libgcc
>    make (*)
>    find . -name unwind.h -ls > ls1
> 
>    diff ls0 ls1 indeed shows
> 
>    < 4883963   12 -rw-r--r--   1 hainque  users       10246 May 24 14:42 ./gcc/include/unwind.h
>    > 4883963   12 -rw-r--r--   1 hainque  users       10246 May 24 15:00 ./gcc/include/unwind.h
> 
>  (*) For this sequence to work, I had to change libgcc_tm.h into libgcc_tm.stamp
>      in the list of files removed by "clean:" in libgcc/Makefile.in. Otherwise the
>      second make fails to rebuild libgcc, complaining about libgcc_tm.h missing
>      (removed by clean and not rebuilt because .stamp remained there).

I think you need to remove both files?  Can you send a patch for that?

>  On a tree with the patch applied, the difference on gcc/include/unwind.h before and after the
>  rebuild disappears.
>  
>  I also checked that unwind.h remains copied by install-no-fixedincludes.
> 
>  OK to apply ?

Ok.

Paolo


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]