This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] fix semi-random template specialization ICE


Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> a Ãcrit:

[...]

> Anyway, the problem is that, for some unsuitable candidate template
> specializations, tsubst returns error_mark_node, which tsubst_decl
> stores in argvec, and later on register_specialization gets this
> error_mark_node and tries to access it as a tree_vec.
>
> The trivial patch that avoids the misbehavior is returning
> error_mark_node as soon as we get that for argvec.  Bootstrapped on
> i686-pc-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu, regstrapped on the latter.
>
> Ok to install?

FYI, this has been reported as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209, so you might add a
reference to that bug in the ChangeLog.

Other than that, I cannot approve or reject this patch, but FWIW, it
looks fine to me.

Let's CC jason.

> for  gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> from  Alexandre Oliva  <aoliva@redhat.com>
>
> 	* pt.c (tsubst_decl): Bail out if argvec is error_mark_node.
>
> Index: gcc/cp/pt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/cp/pt.c.orig	2012-04-30 15:34:44.018432544 -0300
> +++ gcc/cp/pt.c	2012-04-30 15:34:47.988375071 -0300
> @@ -10626,6 +10626,8 @@ tsubst_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_f
>  		tmpl = DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (t);
>  		gen_tmpl = most_general_template (tmpl);
>  		argvec = tsubst (DECL_TI_ARGS (t), args, complain, in_decl);
> +		if (argvec == error_mark_node)
> +		  RETURN (error_mark_node);
>  		hash = hash_tmpl_and_args (gen_tmpl, argvec);
>  		spec = retrieve_specialization (gen_tmpl, argvec, hash);
>  	      }

Thanks.

-- 
		Dodji


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]