This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Update longlong.h from GLIBC


On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:20 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:59:34 Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>> On 08/05/12 10:04, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> > On Tuesday, May 08, 2012 10:43:14 Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:11 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I am preparing to update GLIBC longlong.h from GCC. ?This patch
>>> >>> updates GCC longlong.h to use a URL instead of an FSF postal address
>>> >>> and ?replace spaces with tab. ?OK to install?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Since I'd like to simply copy longlong.h from GCC release branch to
>>> >>> GLIBC, Is this also OK for 4.7 branch?
>>> >>
>>> >> Why? ?Does it fix anything there?
>>> >
>>> > It makes sharing the file between gcc and glibc easier,
>>> >
>>> > Andreas
>>>
>>> Why should glibc be depending on the GCC release branch? ?Sounds like
>>> the tail wagging the dog.
>>
>> Ah, you discuss the release branch ;) Let HJ defend that one.
>>
>>
>>> Changing this file has quite a high potential for introducing
>>> regressions. ?I don't think we should risk that on the release branch.
>>
>> It's only whitespace ?IMO. I'm arguing for the trunk to take the change,
>>
>
> I will take whatever I can get.
>
> Ian, is this OK for trunk?

Yes.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]