This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: strengthen protection against REG_EQUIV/EQUAL on !REG set


On May 4, 2012, at 16:16 , Richard Sandiford wrote:

> Sorry, was going to test this earlier, but got distracted by
> lower-subreg stuff.

 No problem at all. I just happened to have had an opportunity to
 test as part of a series of miscellaneous other submissions.

>  I need to fix the subreg handling so that
> we check whether the inner part of a SUBREG is a REG (done in
> my copy at home).

 Indeed. That was in the original patch and I missed the
 difference in the alternate version.

>  I also wanted to make sure there were no
> asm differences due to notes being wrongly dropped.

 Ah, nice :)

 Thanks much for your feedback,

 Olivier


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]