This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 51222

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at gmail dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:28:12 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 51222
References: <4F9B4B10.7090409@oracle.com> <4F9B62F0.5090202@redhat.com> <4F9BD0B8.4030005@oracle.com> <4F9CB2C9.3060700@redhat.com> <4F9D6180.4030408@oracle.com> <4F9EC605.2050703@redhat.com>

Hi,

> Your patch only looks at immediate subexpressions; I believe what the ABI means is any subexpression, which is why I think something involving walk_tree might be the way to go.

Ok, I'm going to open code something using walk_tree and quite similar to for_each_template_parm but checking also TREE_TYPE, let's if it's enough at least to avoid the regressions.
> 

Thanks,
Paolo

References:
- [RFH / Patch] PR 51222
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 51222
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 51222
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 51222
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 51222
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFH / Patch] PR 51222
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]