This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][ARM] NEON DImode neg

From: Andrew Stubbs <ams at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "patches at linaro dot org" <patches at linaro dot org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:12:47 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] NEON DImode neg
References: <4F4D12C5.9070805@codesourcery.com> <4F704189.4010302@codesourcery.com> <4F86F932.60606@arm.com> <4F897239.1090901@codesourcery.com> <4F897794.7010402@codesourcery.com> <4F8C138B.6090309@arm.com>

On 16/04/12 13:41, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

P.S. This patch can't actually be committed until my "NEON DImode
immediate constants" patch is approved and committed. (Without that the
load #0 needs a constant pool, and loading constants this late has a bug
at -O0.)

neon-neg64.patch

2012-04-12 Andrew Stubbs<ams@codesourcery.com>

	gcc/
	* config/arm/arm.md (negdi2): Use gen_negdi2_neon.
	* config/arm/neon.md (negdi2_neon): New insn.
	Also add splitters for core and NEON registers.

OK

Thanks, now that the other patch is committed, I've committed this one also.

Andrew

References:
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] NEON DImode neg
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] NEON DImode neg
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] NEON DImode neg
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [PATCH][ARM] NEON DImode neg
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]