This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: set the correct block info for the call stmt in fnsplit (issue6111050)

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Rong Xu <xur at google dot com>, reply at codereview dot appspotmail dot com, davidxl at google dot com, hubicka at ucw dot cz
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:50:06 +0200
Subject: Re: set the correct block info for the call stmt in fnsplit (issue6111050)
References: <20120424215703.8BAE5C187E@rong.mtv.corp.google.com> <CA+=Sn1k1tOYs=87BLXYu8F2br5gXSbdMuRbpGxd58sHOm1UnvQ@mail.gmail.com>

> We do not depend on the block structure any more when dealing with
> stack layout for variables in GCC 4.7.0 and above.  I am not saying
> your patch is incorrect or not needed.  Just it will not have an
> effect on variable stack layout.

It might be worth backporting to the 4.6 branch though, these stack layout 
issues are very nasty.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: set the correct block info for the call stmt in fnsplit (issue6111050)
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- set the correct block info for the call stmt in fnsplit (issue6111050)
  - From: Rong Xu
- Re: set the correct block info for the call stmt in fnsplit (issue6111050)
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]