This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix PR52977
On Apr 26, 2012, at 3:43 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> How hard would it be to drop that limitation?
It would be a mistake to try... My take away from the work on a compile server I worked on is that a header whose semantics don't change is critical. Just checking this property for a header, is a massive time sink, so, ideally, you don't really want to check for or verify this property either. I look froward to a nice module system coupled with a new macro system for C++... :-)