This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, LTO, 4.6] Backport Honza's PR48246 patch

From: Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:05:09 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH, LTO, 4.6] Backport Honza's PR48246 patch
References: <1334952949.3078.38.camel@otta> <CAFiYyc1kisVLZPCNy_ZE+u_60wRTUbJGciVvrC+LDSPT3608Og@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:33 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > We're still hitting the overzealous assert identified in PR49246 that is
> > looking for empty LTO partitions, even after the change to a checking assert.
> > How about we backport Honza's mainline patch that stops the creation of empty
> > partitions in the first place?  Speaking with honza on IRC, he thought it was
> > probably a good idea to backport it.
> >
> > I bootstrapped and regtested the backport patch below on powerpc64-linux with
> > no regressions.
> >
> > Ok for the 4.6 branch?
> 
> Ok.

Thanks, committed as revision 186703.

Peter

References:
- [PATCH, LTO, 4.6] Backport Honza's PR48246 patch
  - From: Peter Bergner
- Re: [PATCH, LTO, 4.6] Backport Honza's PR48246 patch
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]