This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR c/44774 -Werror=edantic
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
> On 22 April 2012 22:09, Gabriel Dos Reis <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jason Merrill <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/22/2012 02:42 PM, Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÅez wrote:
>>>> Which seems to suggest that we add an option name for each pedwarn
>>>> enabled by default. Is this also what you suggest?
>>> I agree with this, and I think that's also what Gaby was suggesting by
> Fine, this makes sense to me. I opened PR c/53075 to track this.
> However, adding one option for each pedwarn is a huge task that seems
> unlikely to be ever completed.
Hmm, I do not think we really need additional option set separately
from the existing