This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] improve caret diagnostics for overload failures

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 04:26:32PM +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> On 21 April 2012 16:22, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
>> > Do no use 'char' as the type of a flag. ?Prefer 'unsigned int'.
>> >
>>
>> Thanks, good catch! Should I worry about memory here and use something shorter?
>
> If it is a bool flag, you certainly should use bool type, which is shorter.

It is a bit flag -- see the patch in his original message and 'enum
diagnostic_info_flags'.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]