This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at gmail dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:20:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363
References: <4F8EFD66.10306@oracle.com> <4F8F0F3A.1030701@redhat.com> <4F8F5CC3.6030906@oracle.com> <4F8F8F50.8050804@redhat.com> <4F9008E2.30404@oracle.com> <4F905E5D.5040801@redhat.com> <FF9EAE93-327D-4749-980B-60551AEB29B7@oracle.com>

On 04/19/2012 03:00 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Yes, that's life ;) Seriously, if we want to avoid all those having to do with implicit_conversion in one swoop, the eventual patch will be pretty big, should I just go on and on?

I think so. Once we start down this road, we should follow it to the end.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 52363
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 52363
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]