This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Cleanup tree-switch-conversion a bit
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Steven Bosscher <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Guenther <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I suppose generic tree handling routines are confused by NULL TREE_TYPE
>> and thus changing the docs to void_type_node would be more appropriate.
> I don't agree with that. The documented behavior is much older than
> either the Fortran or the go front end, so the safest way is to fix
> those front ends to match the documentation.
> With my patch modified as attached, bootstrap&test still passes. OK?
The Go bits approved on IRC by Iant, the Fortran bits are obvious, and
the rest was already approved. This is r186579 now.