This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Fixinclude]: Fix typo and default to twoprocess on VMS
On Apr 17, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Tristan Gingold <email@example.com> wrote:
>> one-process methodology cannot be used on VMS[...]
>> But, when twoprocess is selected, gcc emits a warning[...]
>> Ok for trunk ?
>> diff --git a/fixincludes/configure.ac b/fixincludes/configure.ac
>> index e7de791..f1fb2ff 100644
>> --- a/fixincludes/configure.ac
>> +++ b/fixincludes/configure.ac
>> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ fi],
>> i?86-*-msdosdjgpp* | \
>> i?86-*-mingw32* | \
>> x86_64-*-mingw32* | \
>> - *-*-beos* )
>> + *-*-beos* | \
>> + *-*-*vms*)
> This, definitely.
>> diff --git a/fixincludes/fixincl.c b/fixincludes/fixincl.c
>> index 9f399ab..1133534 100644
>> --- a/fixincludes/fixincl.c
>> +++ b/fixincludes/fixincl.c
>> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ fix_with_system (tFixDesc* p_fixd,
>> * Now add the fix number and file names that may be needed
>> - sprintf (pz_scan, " %ld '%s' '%s'", (long) (p_fixd - fixDescList),
>> + sprintf (pz_scan, " %ld '%s' '%s' '%s'", (long) (p_fixd - fixDescList),
>> pz_fix_file, pz_file_source, pz_temp_file);
>> else /* NOT an "internal" fix: */
> This, almost certainly. I'll take a peek at the source and convince myself of
> this decade old mistake tomorrow & send my grateful thanks and approval then.
> (No access to source today.)
Fine, I stay tuned.