Re: [C++ Patch] PR 49152

[Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>]

Hi,
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Marc Glisse<marc.glisse@inria.fr>  wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >
> > > a hybrid approach; I would suggest something like this: (a) if caret
> > > is in effect, then print
> > > the caret pointing to the symbol in question; otherwise (b) print the
> > > symbol and the type (as suggested by Marc).
> >
> > I may have forgotten the details, but looking at the beginning of the PR,
> > don't we always want the types?
> Yes.
Ok, then do I understand correctly that we want something like the 
below? First, If the caret is not active, we print the reconstructed 
expression. Then always the types.

I *think* things are fine translation-wise (I generated and inspected 
gcc.pot) and otherwise patch regtests fine on x86_64-linux (well, by 
default, when the caret is active, the behavior should be identical to 
what I posted about a month ago)

Thanks,
Paolo.

/////////////////

Attachment: CL_49152_2
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_49152_2
Description: Text document