This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Should SRA stop producing COMPONENT_REF for non-bit-fields (again)?


Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> writes:

>> Anyway, the patch I posted previously would risk re-introducing PR
>> 50386 and PR 50326, even though they are very unlikely with just
>> bit-fields.  So my current working version is the following, but it
>> causes failure of libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx execution test so I'm
>> not actually proposing it yet (sigh).
>
> I would not worry about mudflap tests.  The patch looks good to my
> eyes.

Are you sure the failure is new?  At least for 64-bit at -O,
libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx already fails right now (cf. PR
libmudflap/49843).

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]