This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][ARM] NEON DImode neg


On 12/04/12 16:48, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
If negation in Neon needs a scratch register, it seems to me to be
somewhat odd that we're disparaging the ARM version.

Good point, I'm really meaning to provide missing functionality in NEON to prevent unnecessary moves, rather than cause them, so I should remove the '?'s.


It probably doesn't need disparaging on A8, etiher?

Also, wouldn't it be sensible to support a variant that was
early-clobber on operand 0, but loaded immediate zero into that value first:

	vmov	Dd, #0
	vsub	Dd, Dd, Dm

That way you'll never need more than two registers, whereas today you
want three.

That does seem like a good option. I'll have a go and see what happens.


Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]