This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
> I would suggest that we keep the HLE acq/rel bits independent of the
> memory order bits. ?Both are independent on a conceptual level. ?And we
> should add documentation that tells programmers that memory orders need
> always be specified.
>
Sorry, I didn't get your point. You propose to separate HLE-capable
builtins at all?
How will we make it independent without new param introduction?
New param introduction will make new builtin.
We already had that: see initial patch - it contains HLE-featured
intrinsics (and builtins),
independent of __atomic*
K
- References:
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC