This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 01:37:24PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Folks,
> Here is patch with removed implied atomic ACQUIRE/RELEASE. Could you
> please have a look?
+
+ sprintf (hle_macro, "__ATOMIC_HLE_ACQUIRE=%d", IX86_HLE_ACQUIRE);
+ def_or_undef (parse_in, hle_macro);
+
+ sprintf (hle_macro, "__ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE=%d", IX86_HLE_RELEASE);
+ def_or_undef (parse_in, hle_macro);
This doesn't belong to ix86_target_macros_internal, but to
ix86_target_macros. It is defined unconditionally, so you don't want to
undef and define it again on each target pragma, and furthermore
cpp_undef with __ATOMIC_HLE_ACQUIRE=something wouldn't work (for
undef you'd need __ATOMIC_HLE_ACQUIRE). And in ix86_target_macros
you should be able to use cpp_define_formatted and avoid the temporary
buffer.
As for the rest of the patch, I'd like Richard to chime in...
Jakub
- References:
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC