This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
> Perhaps HLE_ACQUIRE / HLE_RELEASE should be something like HLE_START /
> HLE_END instead? ?Not particularly great names, but at least it avoids
> overloading ACQUIRE/RELEASE and thus should make it clearer that you
> still need to specify a memory order.
>
IMHO, this is also not as good, since ACQUIRE/RELEASE reflect actual
prefixies names.
HLE_START/END may confuse user even more.
I am also, agree with Jakub, such things shouldn't be implied. Going
to remove it from patch
K
- References:
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC
- Re: [i386, patch, RFC] HLE support in GCC