This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Phone call (was Re: Armhf dynamic linker path)
- From: Michael Hope <michael dot hope at linaro dot org>
- To: Paulo César Pereira de Andrade <paulo dot cesar dot pereira dot de dot andrade at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Steve McIntyre <steve dot mcintyre at linaro dot org>, cross-distro at lists dot linaro dot org, Adam Conrad <adconrad at debian dot org>, linaro-toolchain at lists dot linaro dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:16:17 +1200
- Subject: Re: Phone call (was Re: Armhf dynamic linker path)
- References: <20120331103406.GA17776@einval.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <4F83B5AD.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <4F83B939.email@example.com> <4F84AC96.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20120411010608.GC25263@einval.com> <20120411223755.GD25263@einval.com> <CANLjY-k73dZJmE9YOvy-fG3rH_L-Ycz6tt4tsV7CKo3t5phSoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHAq8pGbEtmu=QuOFGJpPCck6fFmb63Zm+Ax5B9Bg-m3U1UQ_w@mail.gmail.com>
2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> Em 11 de abril de 2012 20:22, Michael Hope <email@example.com> escreveu:
>> On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>>And here's the details as promised.
>>>>I've started a wiki page at
>>>>with a strawman agenda for now, and a Doodle poll at
>>>>to see when the best time is for the call on Thursday/Friday. Please
>>>>fill in the times that work for you ASAP and I'll announce the result
>>>>during Wednesday. Ideally we'd like stakeholders from all the relevant
>>>>distros and the upstream toolchain developers to be there, able to
>>>>represent their groups and (importantly) able to make a decision here
>>>>on what we should do.
>>>>Apologies for the short notice, but we need a decision quickly.
>>> And the best time turns out to be Friday at 15:00 UTC (16:00 BST,
>>> 11:00 EDT etc.). Of the 10 people who responded in the poll, the only
>>> person who can't make that time is Michael in .nz. Sorry, Michael.
>> All good. ?My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it:
>> ?* is similar to /lib/ld-x86-64.so.2
>> ?* keeps the libraries and loader in the same directory
>> ?* doesn't invent a new /libhf directory
>> ?* is easier to implement in GLIBC
>> ?* is architecture and ABI unique
>> ?* requires less change for distros where the hard float libraries are
>> already in /lib
> ?Sorry for more bikeshedding, but afaik rpm based distros are
> using the armv7hl identifier, so it could as well be
This includes the ABI (h), adds the endianess (l), and implies a
architecture level (v7). The name for the most common configurations
should be as short as possible so I'd rather drop the 'l' and add a
'b' or 'eb' if anyone wants a big endian distro in the future. The
architecture level is a problem as the loader should also be valid on
ARMv5 and ARMv6 hard float builds. Skype should be able to make a
hard float binary that runs on everything, including a potential ARMv6
hard float RaspberryPi build.
> ?Other variant could be
This introduces both a new directory and a new style for naming :)