This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Atom: Scheduler improvements for better imul placement
Igor Zamyatin <email@example.com> writes:
> Hi All!
> It is known that imul placement is rather critical for Atom processors
> and changes try to improve imul scheduling for Atom.
> This gives +5% performance on several tests from new OA 2.0 testsuite
> from EEMBC.
> Tested for i386 and x86-64, ok for trunk?
Did you measure how much this slows down the compiler when compiling
for Atom? The new pass looks rather slow.
firstname.lastname@example.org -- Speaking for myself only