This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465


2012/4/7 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>:
> On 04/07/2012 11:37 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps it is more correct like that, in cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type ?
>
> Even that seems late. ?Why not just return the target decl from
> cp_parser_class_name?

Ah yes, that's slightly better.
(I've kept the NULL check in strip_using_decl, it seems safer to me.
Just tell me if you prefer not)
Tested x86_64-unkown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk and 4.7 ?

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

2012-03-08  Fabien Chêne  <fabien@gcc.gnu.org>

       PR c++/52465
       * g++.dg/lookup/using52.C: New.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

2012-03-08  Fabien Chêne  <fabien@gcc.gnu.org>

       PR c++/52465
       * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Call strip_using_decl.
       * parser.c (cp_parser_class_name): Call strip_using_decl and
       perform some checks on the target decl.
       * name-lookup.c (strip_using_decl): Returns NULL_TREE if the decl
       to be stripped is NULL_TREE.
       (qualify_lookup): Call strip_using_decl and perform some checks on
       the target decl.


-- 
Fabien

Attachment: 52465_3.patch
Description: Binary data


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]